Category Archives: Uncategorized

Time, Cinema, Consciousness, Being.

I was constructing a digital optical printer for my friend Robert Polidori to use. One function I worked on was what I thought would be a simple frame duplication system for video files.

I used  a MAX/MSP/Jitter software tool to allow me to multiply video and corresponding audio “frames”, so that, for instance, something that had an original frame could be doubled to have two of every original frame.

So I could have a 1-second video clip of 30 frames per second copy into a 2-second video clip of 30 frames per second. Every single frame would be doubled. With video, no problem.

But the audio duplication gave an unexpected problem. I loaded the audio track into a buffer in RAM, which is addressable per sample–48000 per second. And II copied each sample, so that the new file will have two samples for every one in the original file.

The thing is… duplicating it had the result of cutting the perceivable playback frequency by half. 

The duplicated sample didn’t register as a change in audio. Instead, the duplication doubled the time that the initial sample was held, which cut the frequency in half. So the pitch actually dropped.

Remember that if a simple sine wave is played at 60 cycles per second, the speaker that plays it moves back and forth sixty times, making pressure waves in the air that match that back and forth frequency,

But this isn’t a full sample of a sound wave’s cycle. It is an audio sample of 1/48000 of a second, Essentially, the speaker cone doesn’t move. The cone won’t move until it has a new, different sample. 

The model this has for sensible time is striking to me. Following this model: a visual stimulus can have its duration extended without changing the nature of what is perceived. However, a sound stimulus is RELIANT on time to exist… sound is the registering of the differences of air pressure through time. If there is no change, there is no sound.

So our senses at once live in two temporal modes: the atemporal, where nothing changes, and the eotemporal, where there is sequence. Our awareness, our consciousness, is always positioning our self across these two. 

Thus: simultaneous opposites.

Between Analog and Digital

Another posting in response to posts by Tom Sherman and others, on Tom’s website, on May 18.

I’ve noted above the divisions between film and video that I noticed from the beginning of consumer video technology (I put this at the arrival of video porta paks from Japan in the early 1970s). At that time, no one saw video at Anthology Film Archives, and it was well over a decade before I saw it at the SF Cinematheque, either.

But what excited me in the mid 1980s was the introduction of two technologies: interactive video disc (analog) and Truevision’s “Targa” video graphic card.

The Targa card took analog video input and output RGB analog video synched with a digital overlay. In 1985 I started a company with old friends and new, integrating hardware and software to produce interactive marketing systems using videodiscs, touchscreens, and Targa boards. By 1987 I’d learned enough C programming to make my own authoring and performance system that also used analog, interactive video discs, computers, Targa boards, and video screens. I called it “Living Cinema”.

My goal with Living Cinema was to create cinema in real time. It wasn’t film, and it was both analog and digital. It had prerecorded elements, but also real-time elements. And the aesthetics reached both into film and video history (as well as music and other audio histories). If you’re interested, some samples are archived here: https://www.robertedgar.com/cinema-performance/

The thing is, at the moment when the personal computer appeared, there was a period of time when the analog and digital smeared into each other.

A couple of years later, I was at Commodore working with Amigas when the Video Toaster was released. Another hybrid, but one that landed more solidly in the video editing studio.

If you look back to the writings of the Russian filmmaker Sergei Eisenstein, you find that his concept of montage overlapped his concept (and practice) of writing. He didn’t want to write linearly, he wanted to create a “circular book” where words and texts had multiple links to other words and texts. This is like a big video disc, just awaiting the cinematographer/viewer to leap from shot to shot, frame to frame. Thus Living Cinema. And thus hypertext: just below is a long URL that is a hypertext link to my 1986 article on this subject–preceding the web.

Sorry about all the self-referencing, but I’ve been navigating down these exact paths since I was at Synapse… film/video, analog/digital, art/business, and preconstructed/live performance. And all of these paths I find fecund… not academic really, but because when you mess them all up they provide a lot of juicy play… between the lines.

Art and Film and Video and Synapse

This was first published (May 18 2024) as a note to Tom Sherman, replying to a posting he made about Syracuse University’s VPA and Newhouse Schools.

Tom,

Well-thought, and well-written. This is a huge subject, one that has a long and important history at Syracuse, and one that is still developing at the speed of light.

have a lot to relate about the subjects you bring up here. And even more in the doing, every stroke of the way. I will respectfully keep it as brief as I can, as your text already invokes so much. I’ll provide some teleological history, about the early cleaving between film and video at Syracuse University. It’s personal, as I’m describing what was happening while I was part of it.

I entered Syracuse in 1970, in liberal arts. Within a month I switched to VPA, as I couldn’t stand the huge lecture class format. I entered VPA with an Independent Study major… I was the only person I knew with that designation. I took a film class from Newhouse, as Newhouse had the only film equipment. In the class we used 16mm film and equipment. My learning was primarily through hitchhiking down to Manhattan, where Anthology Film Archives had just opened, and my high-school friend Robert Polidori worked, and would show me hours of films during my visits… augmented by the formal shows at night.

In a couple of years VPA hired Owen Shapiro and announced its own film major. We continued to use Newhouse’s 16mm equipment (and B&W processing). Owen showed us hours of Godard films, which we’d never see through Newhouse. While in New York I’d visit the Kitchen and hear early Steve Reich and Phil Glass performances, my Newhouse film teacher contemptuously referred to them as the “maniacal edge” of music. No one at Newhouse would know who Michael Snow or Paul Sharrits were.

Meanwhile, a handful of brilliant, late-1960s Syracuse alumni (Lance Wisniewski, Bob Burns, Carl Geiger, Gail Waldron) put together a project proposal to simultaneously offer the University a plan to build and manage a local cable system that would offer students, staff, and faculty their own access to video production and presentation; and an offer to the New York State Council of the Arts to provide access to video production facilities and services to artists in New York state who want to get involved in the new video medium. Note that up to that moment, video production required access to television studios and their procedures, which was prohibitively expensive, not open to outsiders, nor accommodating to experimentation with the equipment.

Thus Synapse Video was born within Syracuse University. Newhouse provided access to 2” tape facilities for broadcast-quality production, and the cable head end provided access to ½” portable and 1” studio-based equipment, along with both portable and studio cameras. Here’s a link to a post by Synapse editor Paul Daugherty about the Newhouse side: https://avideolife.wordpress.com/…/editing-area-used…/

and a link to an early announcement of the Synapse visiting artist program: https://www.vasulka.org/…/MediaPoli…/VisitingArtProg.pdf

At the beginning of the program, there were three of us who were both SU VPA students and part of Synapse: myself, Pam Shaw, and Bill Viola. For my part in this, I designed and taught two classes offered through VPA: a visiting artist class that trained and provided crew for the visiting artists, and a class in “Video Aesthetics” which was a hands-on class where we all experimented with the equipment and tried to understand what we were doing in relation to the history of art.

Film majors had very little to do with Synapse, which was purely video-based. I was really the only one with a foot in both. In 1972 VPA created a Film Major, and I switched from an Independent Study major to a Film major. However, my daily practice was in both: video art (or, as you say, art video) at Synapse, and film art through my major. Note that after graduating with the first VPA Film Majors in 1974, Synapse paid my tuition for the next two years, so I continued to teach the two video courses as I was then one of the first group of students who earned a Film graduate degree through VPA. Again: a foot in both worlds, but both were in VPA.

The thing is, this all happened so fast, and the media were developing so quickly, that the University gambled that it was doing the right thing. We all did the same thing—it’s easy to see that people involved at the time in film or video art were not looking at their long-term financial prospects. There wasn’t a business there to be learned. There were just lives to be invented.

One more historical note: all of us at that time were informed by the ever-present art education department, which insisted that art education focus on the first six years of life… before the child learned to read. And the title of that department was Synaesthetic Education. VPA put an end to that a few years after I left.